The Law of Inevitable Probability
Even the dead have rights!
Think of it, the dead have the right not to be experimented on unless prior authorized while alive. In this country the dead cannot be organ harvested unless prior authorized while alive. We have the right to produce a last will and testament while alive and when we are dead, our rights remain for that last will and testament to be carried out with the full support and strength of the law. It is as binding and contractual as anything we have while alive. The dead have rights. Why not the unborn?
Why not the unborn? As said in a previous article, the actual debate is not an argument of when life begins - science answers that easily. At conception there is a brand new DNA driven living organism. If a protozoan (a single-celled amoeba - animal) is alive, then you cannot argue that the embryo is not alive. No, the argument is whether or not it is a person protected under the Constitution of the United States of America. A protozoan is not a person. Neither is a dog or an ape.
My definition is simple. A person is a human. All human beings are people and should be protected by the Constitution of the United States of America. Is a fetus a human? Yes!
I call it inevitable probability. What is the probability that the embryo will become anything but a human being if left to run it’s natural course? Answer? 100% Not 99.9999999999999999%, flat 100%! It will not come out a newt, or a frog, a sword fish or a monkey. It will be human. It is inevitable. What is the probability that this embryo will become a growing, living, breathing, contributing citizen of this nation if it is not killed first? Aside from dying in childbirth or soon after due to disease or other unforeseen complications, the probability is inevitable!
Some argue that since it is dependent, undeveloped, perhaps unthinking or unfeeling, that it is okay to kill it. That it somehow negates it’s humanity. Then let us say an analgesic patient goes into a comma. It is dependent and cannot feel. The patient cannot feel, cannot think, is completely dependent, and it’s abilities are the same as being completely undeveloped. Is it okay to kill that person? People come out of comma’s all the time! What about brain dead? There have been cases where brain damage was healed! Well, the brain actually has the ability to rewire itself around the damaged parts of the brain! People die and have been brought back to life. When they die, they are void of all capabilities that the prior argument denotes is necessary for life to be “worth” sustaining. So why do we see it as okay to kill the unborn? They are humans too. DNA proven!
If the dead have rights, why not our babies?
Jared Williams
Think of it, the dead have the right not to be experimented on unless prior authorized while alive. In this country the dead cannot be organ harvested unless prior authorized while alive. We have the right to produce a last will and testament while alive and when we are dead, our rights remain for that last will and testament to be carried out with the full support and strength of the law. It is as binding and contractual as anything we have while alive. The dead have rights. Why not the unborn?
Why not the unborn? As said in a previous article, the actual debate is not an argument of when life begins - science answers that easily. At conception there is a brand new DNA driven living organism. If a protozoan (a single-celled amoeba - animal) is alive, then you cannot argue that the embryo is not alive. No, the argument is whether or not it is a person protected under the Constitution of the United States of America. A protozoan is not a person. Neither is a dog or an ape.
My definition is simple. A person is a human. All human beings are people and should be protected by the Constitution of the United States of America. Is a fetus a human? Yes!
I call it inevitable probability. What is the probability that the embryo will become anything but a human being if left to run it’s natural course? Answer? 100% Not 99.9999999999999999%, flat 100%! It will not come out a newt, or a frog, a sword fish or a monkey. It will be human. It is inevitable. What is the probability that this embryo will become a growing, living, breathing, contributing citizen of this nation if it is not killed first? Aside from dying in childbirth or soon after due to disease or other unforeseen complications, the probability is inevitable!
Some argue that since it is dependent, undeveloped, perhaps unthinking or unfeeling, that it is okay to kill it. That it somehow negates it’s humanity. Then let us say an analgesic patient goes into a comma. It is dependent and cannot feel. The patient cannot feel, cannot think, is completely dependent, and it’s abilities are the same as being completely undeveloped. Is it okay to kill that person? People come out of comma’s all the time! What about brain dead? There have been cases where brain damage was healed! Well, the brain actually has the ability to rewire itself around the damaged parts of the brain! People die and have been brought back to life. When they die, they are void of all capabilities that the prior argument denotes is necessary for life to be “worth” sustaining. So why do we see it as okay to kill the unborn? They are humans too. DNA proven!
If the dead have rights, why not our babies?
Jared Williams
